Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Recently, the increasing of the polygamy in modern life has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "has polygamy increased widely in modern life?". Whereas it is a widely held view that increasing of the polygamy is beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, social norms are bound up inextricably with standards of behavior, which indicates they lead to both family bonding and polygamy. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between plygamist societies and family income as well as an exponential increase in marriage problems. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of loyalty is correlated positively with not only partner but also social laws.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, modern life attribute to stressful lifestyle, in that it would come down to anxiety, depression, and family expendature. A salient example of such attribution is diverse, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take monogamy for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint soliliquy problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to x, x, and even x. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of education, awarness, and economy condition.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that drawbacks of the polygamy increaseing far outweigh its benefits. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | zjaved | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Ahmed145 | 85 | view |
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change. 11
- The law of attraction is one such behavior that can encompass love and affection towards others. How far do you support this statement? 77
- Do you think students who go to university should pay full fee than who do not go to university given that graduates earn higher salaries. Agree or disagree 85
- It is equally important for school children and university students to be involved in the extracurricular activities as it is good for academic studies and examinations. What’s your opinion? Use your expertise or examples to support. 80
- Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 19, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65836298932 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10616431219 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669039145907 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0034050486 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.307692308 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0238749686236 0.242375264174 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00775127957529 0.0925447433944 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0141534269802 0.071462118173 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0136237275281 0.151781067708 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143239398322 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.