Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
Recently, government investment in arts, music and painting has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should government reduce their investment in different fields of art?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, art fields are bound up inextricably with academic study, which indicates they lead to both music world and painting area. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between financial projects and bank loan as well as an exponential increase in public funding. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of the role of art is correlated positively with not only individual's life but also modern civilization.
Within the realm of economy downturn, without the slightest doubt, private sector attribute to gallery, in that it would come down to art museum, art performance, and sculpture. A salient example of such attribution is a valuable painting, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take handmade goods for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint economy recession problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to cultural heritage, social values, and even tourism. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of mass media and private investment.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that government should not reduce investments in art. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 85
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 11
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change 88
- benefits and problems of studying and performing the old play in high school. 11
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the society standpoint, art fields ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 562, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... is correlated positively with not only individuals life but also modern civilization. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...life but also modern civilization. Within the realm of economy downturn, wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mass media and private investment. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66206896552 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07609400703 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675862068966 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4270132277 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.307692308 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194457148977 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538666803778 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971343024667 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118601849587 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103480091172 0.0609392437508 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.