Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Off late there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that video conference with doctors is beneficial for the patient who requires the treatment on urgent basis. Critics, however, claim that video communication is not the authentic way to approach the doctor. I, personally believe that former argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the pros and cons of this statement before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that online communication with medical professional is helpful for the patients. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that in certain rural areas of the world, medical facilities are only provided in emergency situation. Therefore, with the outbreak of some epidemics, professional consultation is required on urgent basis and this communication can only be possible through video conference with doctors all around the world. As a prime example, WHO has recently organized ambulatory services to certain rural areas of developing countries, where major illnesses are discussed with medical professionals who are not available at that time via video communication.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that video communication with doctors is not the suitable alternate to cure any disease with thoroughly examine the condition of patient. Moreover, emergency surgeries require quick decisions that depends on patient’s critical situation and in this senerio technological advancements are not always reliable source to deal with human life.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds that the benefits of video conference with doctors for treating the patient triumphs over disadvantages. Thus, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | zjaved | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Ahmed145 | 85 | view |
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 77
- . In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 80
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the pros and cons of this statement before ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65836298932 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05378308244 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590747330961 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4282358766 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340084442454 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11410100883 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999092172374 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197353627045 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648773243514 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.