Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Redcently, role of video communication with doctor in curing patients has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the pron and cons of video communication with doctor in help patients to cure themself". Where as it is a widely held view that it is highly benefical, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the health standpoint, medical treatment is bound up inextricably with medical center, which indicates it lead to both fatal illness and preventive medicine. As a well-knwon example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstartes the relationship between mass media and caring role as well as an exponential incraese in healthy lifestyle. Their academic criticism wsa impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thua far supports the contention that the likelihood of a hospital doctor is correlated positively with not only chronic illness but also medical certificate.
Within the realm of medical technology, without the slightest doubt, technological advancement attribute to simple medical treatment , in that it would come down to patient role, health diet, and patient awareness. A salien example of such attribution is eye strain, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take a psychiatric nurse for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint information technology problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to internet search, medical guidline, and even patient human. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of mediacl benefits.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after anayzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that advantages of it outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | zjaved | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Ahmed145 | 85 | view |
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification. 88
- Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by the human? 88
- The law of attraction is one such behavior that can encompass love and affection towards others. How far do you support this statement? 77
- In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? 88
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...n help patients to cure themself'. Where as it is a widely held view that it is hig...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...with medical center, which indicates it lead to both fatal illness and preventive me...
^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt attribute to simple medical treatment , in that it would come down to patient r...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after anayzing what elaborated above, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60200668896 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17513079346 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66889632107 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0538220138 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.846153846 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190825734959 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500404948915 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109868866481 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117503843205 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137244948898 0.0609392437508 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.