People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons of this?
Recently, the phenomenon of managing private and work-related life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of hard working is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a certain amount of time to allocate to ourselves can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, working hard can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of higher income, as well as economic advances in countries, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered statistically how much individuals and society benefit from an hour more efficient working time.
Within the realm of science, setting aside a time for ourselves daily might increase the consequences of mental health. Moreover, fundamental aspects of having some time privately could relate to this reality that the demerits of stressful and busy days pertain to tiring working hours. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of stressful jobs is correlated negatively with psychological disorders. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of life affairs management.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of work and personal life separation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of trade-off in our daily affairs prove the significance of happier private life, but also pinpoint more energetic doing job-related tasks implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-05 | Mehdi.Babaie | 88 | view |
- An old friendis coming to town and has invited you to go to the cinema. Write to your friend. In your letterExplain that you are unable to comeFind out how long your friend is stayingin townArrange a suitable time to meet 51
- Television has improved the quality of life for the the ordinary person Do you agree or diagree 91
- Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your experience. 61
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 88
- Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l analyze that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, working hard c...
^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ment which discovered statistically how much individuals and society benefit from an...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed notion of life affairs management. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52688172043 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11637976157 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663082437276 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1544538662 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.181818182 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0860273811426 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334921835445 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337555286409 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520359694609 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303774786957 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.