Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single.Some People say that this information may be relevant and useful.Others disagree.Discuss both these view
Employers seeking applicant private information like hobbies and interest including marital status has become a trend nowadays. Many people believe that it can be beneficial to provide this kind of details, However, others do not agree the same. Let us examine both sides of the argument followed by my point of view.
First of all, Candidate being married or not plays a vital role in deciding whether he/she is fit for the type of vacancy. For instance, one of my friends applied for chief security officer but interviewer rejected him as the job required late night shifts which can be difficult for him due to personal commitments. Secondly, People with leisure activities like sports, arts, dance are more creative, enthusiastic and active. Thus, can be more physically and mentally sound. Take an example, a person who involved in gymming and sports would be able to perform better in army jobs.
On the other hand, the interviewer can discriminate aspirant on the basis of his interest. For example, if the candidate is passionate about cricket and interviewer is not then it may increase the chances of rejection. In addition, personal data like marital status can mislead or give the wrong perception like a divorcee or single mother may be judged inappropriately irrespective of their capability. Let me give an example, My friend, raising a child alone and due to this factor was not selected for a marriage counsellor position.
From my perspective, as general interest and likings reflect in ones' personality, hence it will make easy for an organisation to choose the correct candidate for the position available. Also, they can select the single or married person as per the job demands. However, the organization should keep in mind to not discriminate anyone against these personal data and give capability more credibility while selecting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | jeetender | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | PALAK AHUJA | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | MihirGosai | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Harrynguyen1980 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | namodi17 | 73 | view |
- Learning English at schools is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, may are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local 65
- University lecturer is now able to put their lectures on the internet for students to read and so the importance of attending face to face lectures has been reduced. Do you believe the use of internet in formal education is a good idea? What future effect 61
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this? 73
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group while others would rather work alone Discuss both sides and give your opinion 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...general interest and likings reflect in ones personality, hence it will make easy fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15841584158 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84919233086 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63696369637 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5352059503 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248105969864 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718584427042 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389658695584 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1417774986 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326888847044 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.