Governments should focus their spending on public services rather than on arts such as music and painting. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Nowadays people are divided on the issue of budget allotment to recreational activities. Advocates are of the view that government should allocate more funds for transportation and community welfare instead of Vocational courses. It is very perplexing to choose one over other. However, I strongly agree that public services are more imperative as compared to counterpart. This essay intends to elucidate this in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, strong network of public services like transportation leads to economic growth of the nation. This is because of the reason that most of the companies established their headquarters in countries which has good transportation infrastructure for employees and transfer of products from one location to other. Therefore, number of job opportunities are increased which result in more number of humankind passing tax to the state administration. Therefore, government gets more funds to spend on other activities. To justify this, a recent study by London University reveals that good infrastructure of a nation attract sixty percent more investment as compared to countries with poor road system. Therefore, public transportation is the major contributor to financial growth of the country apart from other benefits.
Furthermore, there are numerous benefits for the men and women of rewarding welfare services. Firstly, Healthcare Centre build up by the government provide effective treatment at low cost that helps to save the people from ill-effect of diseases. Secondly, the playgrounds are the best gifts for offspring in order to bring up the sports spirit in them. Also, it leads to sound health and mind in them. Thirdly, individuals get the chance to socialize themselves in the community homes where people organize the parties and functions to celebrate their achievements with others. Last but not the least, public transportation services; buses, trains and metros are the only means to an end to curb the pollution caused by private vehicles.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned argument provide plausible statements in favour of diverting more funds towards welfare services as compared to counterpart. Therefore, government should increase the budget towards this segment and even attract foreign investment to provide better public services.
- You need a translation of a document into a different language. you have a friend who speaks that language.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:- explain what the document is and why you need a translation- explain why is in urgent and important 67
- Write a letter to neighbour about the garbage problem you have Introduce yourself Explain the problem Provide appropriate solution 86
- There are many animals species in the world. Some people think we should for back animals from dying out, while others believe we should spend more time on problem of human beings. Discuss both sides and give you opinion. 84
- You recently went on a trip with a friend and you both took some photographs.Write a letter to your friend. In your letterask your friend, to send you one of the photographsexplain why you need that particular photographtell your friend what happened to y 73
- In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Centre) must be used with a third-person verb: 'builds'.
Suggestion: builds
...re services. Firstly, Healthcare Centre build up by the government provide effective ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63714285714 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12693238214 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568571428571 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7169419489 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.842105263 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107955498384 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331749087383 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387060824111 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700288456655 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211615641205 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.