More information available online so library books are useless. Agree or disagree with statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of more information available online so library books are useless and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that library books are useless can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, more information available online can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, more date available online so library books are worthless might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of library books are useless because more information available online far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-07 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | VanithaE | 77 | view |
- The government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 100
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 88
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 88
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 77
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78682170543 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20827465477 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6100178985 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.727272727 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336449397532 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11710574237 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136838409149 0.071462118173 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197565914191 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627726147892 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.