The line graph compares the average price of a
barrel of oil with the food price index over a
period of 11 years.
It is clear that average global prices of both oil and
food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011.
Furthermore, the trends for both commodities
were very similar, and so a strong correlation
(93.6%) is suggested.
In the year 2000, the average global oil price was
close to $25 per barrel, and the food price index
stood at just under 90 points. Over the following
four years both prices remained relatively
stable, before rising steadily between 2004 and
2007. By 2007, the average oil price had more
than doubled, to nearly $60 per barrel, and food
prices had risen by around 50 points.
The line graph compares the average price of a
barrel of oil with the food price index over a
period of 11 years.
It is clear that average global prices of both oil and
food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011.
Furthermore, the trends for both commodities
were very similar, and so a strong correlation
(93.6%) is suggested.
In the year 2000, the average global oil price was
close to $25 per barrel, and the food price index
stood at just under 90 points. Over the following
four years both prices remained relatively
stable, before rising steadily between 2004 and
2007. By 2007, the average oil price had more
than doubled, to nearly $60 per barrel, and food
prices had risen by around 50 points.
- The graph gives information about average price of a barrel of oil and the food price index from 2000 to 2011.It is clear that a dramatic increase in both commodity price was seen over period shown. Furthermore, the trend for both commodities were similar 78
- The line chart above compares the amount of beef, pork, broilers and turkey, which the Americans consumed each year between 1995 and 2012.It is clear from the chart that both broilers and turkey flesh eating, increased significantly from 1960 to 2012 whil 78
- The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of waste released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015.It’s easy to see that the three above bear little to no resemblance in the fluctuation of waste produced in tonnes.In th 89
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 56
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 605.0 965.302439024 63% => OK
No of words: 125.0 196.424390244 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.34370152488 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31925505281 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 170.1 283.868780488 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 9.60324019393 43.030603864 22% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.621655387266 0.215688989381 288% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.328678992892 0.103423049105 318% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19377347011 0.0843802449381 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212552166179 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161624029976 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.