Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things?
It is believed that in modern era, children spend more time on television than creative activities. This essay will present some reasons and propose feasible measures to resolve the issue.
Firstly, when living in the modern society with severe competitions in job market, parents are likely to allocate more time in their offices than stay at home to make their livings. Therefore, they have insufficient time to take care of their children as well as joining some outside and creative activities with their children. As a result, children watch TV as a form of recreation. According to a prestige magazine, children watch TV more than 21.8 hours a week when they are waiting for their parents. Secondly, it is irrefutable that children are likely to be captured by vivid and colorful animations on TV programs so that they are unable to take their off some attractive programs such as Walt Disney, Cartoon Network.
There are a wide range of resolutions to tackle this problem. First of all, parents are encouraged to take part in outdoor or creative activities with their children rather than pay attention to their work. For example, in Vietnam, parents often take their children to parks to engage some creative activities such as painting, cooking. By virtue of engaging outdoor activities, children are able to have more passion with creative games than spend their time to television. Secondly, it would be beneficial for children when amount of time for watching television could be controlled. According to afamily.vn, children age 3 or over are permitted to watch television in two hour per day, and from 2 to 3 years old, it would be better for children to spend one hour per day.
In conclusion, there are a variety of reasons why children watch television than from the past decades and this negative trend could be taken by some aforementioned remedies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-19 | doubletee | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | MrDucPhD | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | ilkin nesrullayev | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | ilkin nesrullayev | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | Toghrul Azizli | 67 | view |
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people. Some people say that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or c 73
- Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness? 61
- Some people think that the development of technology has made our life more complex and the solution is to live a simpler life without that technology Do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 676, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...re permitted to watch television in two hour per day, and from 2 to 3 years old, it ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02564102564 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71031068766 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50641025641 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3225162335 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362537223412 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140655625049 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837028579241 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240637559987 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428576778268 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.