some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries bring many positive developments. Others say it causes the loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In our society nowadays, international cooperation is becoming more and more prevalent. Recently, there are some disputes whether the development of business and cultural interaction among different countries is tremendous benefit or not? This essay is going to investigate both beneficial and detrimental effects of this view before my perspective is advocated.
From one point of view, I am opinion of that business and cultural contact brings profits for indigenous country. Looking at the former, learning foreigner countries’ culture is one of the marvelous way to explode horizons. It is identified that citizens having a wide range of knowledge surpass that of having information restriction. Ho Chi Minh, for instance, helped Viet Nam abolish dependent periods by studying aboard over the permanent time. To conclude, should people resist integration between diversity countries, industrial development of their countries will not accelerate drastically.
Aside from some public debates, the business advance should not rely on culture communication because of negative effects. With regard to feature of country, it is fear that indigenous people have not capability of retaining their traditional because culture aboard has been expanding dramatically. An explanation could be that people anticipate to portray their mother country‘s tradition and culture to the others as well as swap with other knowledge. It is exemplified that Vietnamesse youngsters are curious about imitating Americans’ habits without preserving their own culture. To sum up, not only should people cushion their culture and tradition, they are advised to promote them to other nations.
In conclusion, although there are a variety of benefits of extending of business and cultural communication, it has some disadvantages. I would argue that the advantages of international cooperation over shadow the negative effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-01 | Vuong Linh | 84 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 61
- the charts below show information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 73
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The 57
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82269503546 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21789705017 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641843971631 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0028017617 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219554157178 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655885827135 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542883715811 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116040798046 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294842872488 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.