The two maps below shows road access to a hospital in 2007 and in 2009
The developments of road access to a city hospital from 2007 until 2010 can be revealed by below maps. At least four changes had been created during three years.
The city hospital is still located in Ring Road. However, some enhancements were applied to several public facilities of the hospital I 2010. Previously, car part for staff and public was mixed in one area in Hospital Road. After the renovation, new public car park was opened in the east side of the hospital and the former car park turned into special car park for hospital’s employee. As is shown on the 2007 map, bus stops can be found in the Hospital Road then this facility was replaced with bus station in the left hand side of the Hospital Road.
In addition, brand new change was also developed in 2010. Two roundabouts were placed in between Hospital Road with City Road and Ring Road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-20 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-02 | sasachic10 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 73
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 84
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age group who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, still, then, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69934640523 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44615647292 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.731357189 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8888888889 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316291689413 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129798477818 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105185775478 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21078826055 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00518342361163 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.