The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The column chart illustrates differences in the proportion of home ownership and people renting housing in England and Wales from 1981 to 2011.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the proportion of accommodation owned by households, while the opposite was true for that of people renting place of residence over the period shown.
At the beginning of the period, about 75% of inhabitants in England and Wales selected to rent houses. Meanwhile, the percentage of houses owned by families was just one – third, at 25 per cent. However, the gap appeared to be slowly narrowed from 1939 to 1961. Until 1971, the proportion of households renting and owing accommodation were equally represented at exactly 50%.
Since then, the figure for home ownership experienced a gradual increase, in comparison with a moderate decline in the proportion of residents renting houses from 1981 to 2001. Despite a slight fall of approximately 4% from 78% to 64% in 2011, the rate of households owned accommodation was still higher than that of occupants renting dwellings, which only made up relatively 36%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Ji Due | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Loi Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aria etemadi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to1990. 73
- Task 2: Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 89
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- With divorce rates and family breakdowns increasing globally, it is generally accepted thatfamilies today are not as close as they used to be.Discuss the causes of this problem and offer dome possible solutions to it. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, then, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13966480447 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90384591337 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614525139665 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3274689034 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203718126893 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876621201271 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493701512866 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124192880061 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342452204493 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.