It is important that maintain and protect the beautiful building in the past, even if it is expensive for owners to do so.” what do you think of this statement? Give reasons and examples on your own experience.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people arguing that it is important to maintain and protect old buildings. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter.
There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant on is that why old buildings should be preserved lies in the fact that these old structure can enlighten people on their cultural heritage and offer an insight into how people in earlier centuries used to live. Not only do these buildings serve a didactic purpose, but they can also draw tourists from all over the world, thus augmenting revenues for the government. Needless to say, all these merits stand old buildings in good stead, when it comes to acknowledging their importance on society.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that apart from historical and economical benefits as mentioned above, the preservation of these ancient buildings also have environmental benefits. For instant, instead of demolishing and building new structure, restoring the old one can helps reduce construction waste and saves energy. Hence, it is apparent that why many are in favour of protecting old building.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of ancient buildings are indeed too great to ignore
- Some people think that exercise is the key to health while others feel that having a balanced diet is more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 77
- experiential learning vs traditional learning 85
- ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF CASHLESS SOCIETY. 11
- experiential learning vs traditional learning 92
- traditional learning vs experiential learning 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...e former outdo the latter. There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ument is that apart from historical and economical benefits as mentioned above, the preser...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, thus, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03846153846 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7665552391 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0474260283 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.25397266985 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1194440809 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453171211982 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306753863196 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068484664349 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254342227855 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.