Some people believe that competitive sports, both team and individual, have no place in the school curriculum. How far do you agree or disagree?
Sports have a lot of benefits for people, especially, for the young generation. However, some people claim that having competitive sports at schools are useless because students may be a waste of time and these sports are too dangerous. I strongly disagree with this idea since they are vital for children's development.
First of all, although doing physical activities takes students out of primary subjects such as math and literature, there is no doubt that it is an essential part for the learning process of all pupils since it since it creates a healthy basis for later life. Take an example children who do sports every day have fewer opportunities to have the heart attack and avoid obesity. Moreover, thanks to playing sports, student's brain can be relaxed after long lessons; and consequently, the productivity will be increased.
Secondly, it is impossible to argue the fact that competitive sports help students in social skills development like team building and coalition with others. When people play in a team with the same final goal, they will not be selfish. For students playing individual games, they can not only improve their communication and their problem-solving problems but also enlarge their social relations. Besides, playing sports will teach pupils the practical lessons and how to deal with stressful situations. A good example is when you win a highly competitive match, you will be more confident to go ahead. In contrast, when you are a loser, you must stand up and force yourself to the next one. All of these skills are crucial for students in the future works.
To sum up, there are no reasons that competitive sports should be neglected in schools because of the vast advantages they bring to children in social skills and both physical and mental health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-04 | Mike_Moody | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | HARPREET KAUR MAAN | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-12 | duongthanhson | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | VuXuan | 73 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures 2025.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 69
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'since it'.
Suggestion: since it
... for the learning process of all pupils since it since it creates a healthy basis for later life....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...petitive sports help students in social skills development like team building and coal...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, no doubt, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06375838926 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70403384189 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5281751413 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.785714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174094330566 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573317909542 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393305709456 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10463041787 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150367086701 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.