Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Or
Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Or
Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
Recently, the phenomenon of making a better public transport network in expanded cities by the government and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that building more roads can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, constructing more roads to facilitates car ownership can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, providing a good transport system by governments might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a road constructing's project could relate to this reality that the demerits of the roads safety pertain to the public transportation industry. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of making more roads to allow more vehicle owners far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 88
- Essay topics:It has recently been suggested that the classical, or "dead", languages Latin and Greek should be re-introduced into the school curriculum. Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in get 85
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1207.87684729 155% => OK
No of words: 331.0 242.827586207 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67371601208 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16156177254 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61329305136 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 379.143842365 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6497863244 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.2 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513030444131 0.242375264174 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173398322765 0.0925447433944 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.245465000582 0.071462118173 343% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.35617386636 0.151781067708 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.307342797575 0.0609392437508 504% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 55.0591133005 222% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.