Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
With the advancing technology and increase in number of avid researchers eager to prove the impossible, the number of ongoing researches have gone up drastically over past few decades. It is not practical for government to fund all the ongoing researches. It needs to make a well calculated decision to choose among the researches it should fund. Therefore, clearly funding any scientific research whose consequences are unclear should be at very low priority. I agree with the given recommendation.
We can take example of machine learning which is the hot topic now with everyone trying to do something new with it. With a limited budget, funding all these researches are not possible. There should be some measure or a reliability of a working prototype that the researchers should present in order to make a place in government fund. If government funds one of the researches that has a very strong theory, but no proof of practical validity and later in future that research doesn’t produce the result it claimed in the beginning, it would be a total waste of government money.
With limited budget, funding a research with unclear consequences would lead to some legit researches miss their chance in getting fund. The later research might have more chances of succeeding but has lesser implications than the first.
Although, it might be true that few researches have employed techniques that has never been done or thought of before and thus they don’t have any working prototype to show the potential of their idea to succeed. But, there is a reason why invention is called an invention, because it is never being done or thought of before. Thus, not funding some potential inventions could become major loss for the government.
Thus, government should take a calculated, well thought and well discussed decision to make sure the right deserver gets the funding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Vaibhav Panchal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | sayali7 | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | 08sandip | 50 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 60
- For this task, you will read a passage and then listen to a lecture on the same topic. You may take notes while you read and listen. Then, you will write a response to a question that asks you about the relationship between the reading and the lecture. Th 76
- When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why? 60
- For this task, you will read a passage and then listen to a lecture on the same topic. You may take notes while you read and listen. Then, you will write a response to a question that asks you about the relationship between the reading and the lecture. Th 68
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... money. With limited budget, funding a research with unclear consequences would lead to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11935483871 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8271925456 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545161290323 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0556889784 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73333333333 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249427268239 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900219502935 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495331414548 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135684231317 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060503961305 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.