The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1994.
The given bar charts reveal the information about the marriage and divorce ratio by nine countries during the year 1981 and 1994. The data is calebroted in per centum which is clear and coherent representated.
In the first glance, the divorce ratio of USA during the year 1981 and 1994 at 5.3 and 4.4 thousands. Apart from this, the ratio of divorce at Germany had been same in the year 1981 and 1994 at two thousands. Moving forward, in the Italy minimum ratio of divorce during the year 1981 and 1994 at 0.5 thousands. Furthermore, the rate of divorce in Denmark in both year 1981 and 1994 at 2.8 and 2.7 respectively.
In the second glance, the ratio of marriage in USA during the year 1981 and 1994 at 11, 7.8 thousands. Moving forward, rate of marriage in Japan in year 1981 and 1994 stand that 6.2 and 6.1 thousands. Apart from that, the marriage ratio of 4.8 and 4.5 thousands in year 1981 and 1994. Moreover, the marriage ratio in Italy and Denmark during the year 1981 had been 4.9 and 4.5 thousands, on the other hand, in year 1994 stand 4.6 and 6.5 thousands respectively.
Overall, it is evident that, in the first bar chart maximum divorce rate in USA as well as least rate of divorce in Italy. On the other hand, in the second bar chart highest rate of marriage in USA but the lowest ratio of marriage in fernce and Denmark at different years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | malina | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-10 | Anhngoc | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in euros for the 16-59 age groups as per their education level. 67
- The diagram show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes. 67
- Government should not have been to provide care or financial support for elderly people because it is the responsibility of each person to prepare for retirement and support him and her self. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- Some people think that art is essential subject for children at school while other think it is waste of time. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'chart the highest'.
Suggestion: chart the highest
...y. On the other hand, in the second bar chart highest rate of marriage in USA but the lowest ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, well, apart from, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49397590361 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35206315679 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.369477911647 0.547539520022 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7020598456 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300861152891 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15812175906 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928577001706 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2244578755 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597156247327 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.