Some people say that health care and education should be the responsibility of the government but others think that it is the responsibility of the individuals themselves.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people arguing that government should be liable for the education and health care. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that former outdo the latter.
There are myriads of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that as government collect money from nation in the form of tax, so it should be liable for development of the nation. Not only can government spend tax in improving health sectors, but education department can be flourished. Needless to say, all these merits will stand public in good stead, when it comes to improving their life styles.
There are, however, some drawbacks which can easily overwhelm potential impact of this trend. The primary one stems from the fact that individuals should be responsible for the development of these sectors, because government can provide knowledge through awareness programme. So, it is on public to get awareness from these efforts. Besides, they should be willing to play their role for the development. It is apparent that why many are in favour of efforts done from public.
In the view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of taking responsibilities whether from government or public for the health and education are indeed to great to ignore.
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 61
- Do you think that the English Language will continue to remain as the global language despite globalization? Support your point of view. 72
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.Model An 55
- experiential learning vs traditional learning 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98723404255 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72770272479 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56170212766 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6097698228 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 7.25397266985 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263779870836 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819656941097 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080990426903 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157692708522 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116677563851 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.