experiential learning vs traditional learning
The idea of experiential learning- in other words- learning by experience, is widely debated, with many people claiming that the benefits it offers are no match for its drawbacks. However, I do not agree with this and I will explain in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that experiential learning requires students to cooperate and learn from each others through direct experience tied to real-world problems. It not only does allow students to observe, review and reflect on their early practices, but it also ensures that students remain motivated and actively engaged in posing questions, experimenting, investigating, being curious and problem solving. Apparently, the role of teacher in this approach is not to direct student’s performance, but to facilitate it by embedding suitable experiences and problems into classroom activities. Needless to say, all these merits will stand students in good stead when it comes to offering assistance in their natural learning aptitude.
Another pivotal aspect of this approach is that experiential learning can be applied in high school or college curriculum set in a verity of project-based, campus based and community contexts. As per modern schools of thought, far from encouraging root learning, this approach can be more likely to prepare students to be contributing members and leaders of local, nation and global communities.
In the view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of experiential learning are indeed too great to ignore.
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 61
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.Model An 55
- experiential learning vs traditional learning 85
- traditional learning vs experiential learning 55
- Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, so, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38955823293 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0452997261 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642570281124 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5421082026 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.2 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248855944777 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100667571645 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11061508536 0.071462118173 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163732747747 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456756506254 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.