The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the changes in the amount of CO2 emissions per person in some countries namely Italy, United Kingdom, Sweden, and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
According to the graph, the United Kingdom had always been the lead country in CO2 emissions compared to the other countries although over years it experienced a gradual decline from approximately 11 to roughly 9 metric tons.
Over this period, Sweden had a fluctuating trend. First, it peaked to above 10 in 1977 and then decreased sharply until 1987 followed up by a slower decrease. Finally, in 2007, the emissions’ quantity reached the same value as Portugal’s emissions.
Italy and Portugal underwent an increase over years to the point that Italy’s emissions in 1987 far passed Sweden’s. On the other hand, the least emissions had always been for Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
In conclusion, the United Kingdom and Portugal had respectively the highest and lowest rate of the emissions per person. Sweden and Italy were standing in middle places although they were going through different changes over the period.
- TOPIC # 46 What are the important qualities of a good son or daughter? Have these qualities changed or remained the same over time in your culture? 80
- TOPIC # 55 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. 80
- TOPIC # 51 Some people believe that success in life comes from taking risks or chances. Others believe that success results from careful planning. In your opinion, what does success come from? 90
- The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper."Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to w 80
- "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28248587571 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86005196104 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7897846823 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237475163593 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10466219758 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780100756074 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148174844815 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764790758055 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.