The Chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012.
The multi line graph illustrates the changing rates of crime in the inner city between 2003 and 2012.
Have a look on the burglary, there was a 3500 crime incidents in 2003 and which was slightly incline with 200 in the next year.The span of next four years showed a significant declining trend just above 1000 till 2008.Inclinations observed for the following years from 2009 to 2011 and at last it stabled near around a 1500 incidents in last year.
Moving to the car theft and robbery crimes, 3000 incidents were happen in 3 initial years whereas, in 2006 the crime cases sharply fell to with the number of 1000.Afterwards, it kept on 2900 in 2012 however, before the rising the crime rate of under the 2500 in over the span of four years. In case of robbery just under a thousand number of cases in 2003 to 2007 on the other hand, it levelled of on 500 incidents in 2008 and continuesly following wet up, down up trend in all further years.
Overall, the number of incidents of burglary was declined while,car theft cases was increased over the time period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
2019-05-28 | sophia_ever | 78 | view |
2019-05-28 | sophia_ever | 84 | view |
2018-08-01 | harniitkaur | 67 | view |
2018-07-19 | sandee | 78 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 56
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 71
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditure for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year of 2009. 78
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005. 89
- The diagrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inclined'.
Suggestion: inclined
...ncidents in 2003 and which was slightly incline with 200 in the next year.The span of n...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ghtly incline with 200 in the next year.The span of next four years showed a signif...
^^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Inclinations
...clining trend just above 1000 till 2008.Inclinations observed for the following years from 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...and robbery crimes, 3000 incidents were happen in 3 initial years whereas, in 2006 the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Afterwards
...sharply fell to with the number of 1000.Afterwards, it kept on 2900 in 2012 however, befor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 2008 and continuesly following wet up, down up trend in all further years. Ov...
^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , car
...incidents of burglary was declined while,car theft cases was increased over the time...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57591623037 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54937804524 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.0562335302 43.030603864 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.8 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.2 22.9334400587 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118065209895 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759434523986 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777604446959 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873708735584 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824208426761 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.29 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.