Topic: Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
- Some people claim that it is pointless to spend sources on the protection of wild animals and it is unnecessary save their lives in the 21st century mainly because humans do not have need for them. I completely disagree to this view of point on the following grounds.
- To start with, it is totally justified that the existence of animals surrounding humans'environment is importantly contribute to the development of people's society. In case people are partially equipped with knowledge about how to increase the importance of animal conservation, which are directly resulting from the man's predatory instinct combined with his ruthless hunting, people from all walks are enhancing their responsibility across the country's borders to save a wide range of precious animal species. It is wrongly believed that in the 21st century, be lost the natural environment, wild animals are encountered to the fact of preventing conserve the animal habitat as well as their places from humans's reasons. As a matter of fact, the planet Earth is not only be benefit of the humans' lives but only lead to the biological diversity of animal species. Besides, poaching and hunting wild animals for illegally trading with prohibitively expensive prices such as rhino horn, tiger skins or whales are contribute to one of the serious problems of the animals' extinction.
-I also disagree the point that saving animals from the risk of loss is a waste of resources. It is clear that protecting animal species is an crucial part of the humanity, therefore, the government with big organizations should cooperate with each other to raise and scale up the awareness of the large citizens to access to the suitable measures of animal conservation's campaigns. Additionally, reality reveals that extinction is a natural process, some of the animal and plant species had ceased to exist before humans evolved. Nevertheless, a growing number of endangered animals have reached crisis point as mankind's development. Therefore, all the nations across the globe should invest far more in the tough neighborhood in the conservation of animals' existence. Without the constant animals' survial, it is almost impossible for people living in the world, which primarily brought enjoyment by wild animals.
- On the whole, the temporary thinking of animals'future is that stop protecting the life of a number of animals might be an unaccepted idea. Above all, individual's effort will make a difference in the process of maintaining wildlife for animals as well as the growth of the community as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | Sukhwant Singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | mohammad.iraf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | wIsaac | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Faramarz Abbasi | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | sivasankar | 78 | view |
- Topic: Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Topic:the government should invest more money in science rather than other subjects to develop the country. 78
- Topic: Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree? Provide relevant example if necessary. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contributed'.
Suggestion: contributed
...unding humansenvironment is importantly contribute to the development of peoples society. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1012, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contributed'.
Suggestion: contributed
...s rhino horn, tiger skins or whales are contribute to one of the serious problems of the a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1061, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...e to one of the serious problems of the animals extinction. -I also disagree the point...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...clear that protecting animal species is an crucial part of the humanity, therefore...
^^
Line 4, column 451, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s that extinction is a natural process, some of the animal and plant species had ceased to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the whole, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21549636804 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97405804664 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556900726392 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.3118766639 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.6 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215504504445 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745903508188 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560791639885 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135161086812 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507441698464 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.