Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today our social network is expanding, we can see celebrities having hundreds of millions of followers on social medias, e.g. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. Almost everyone, especially the young generation, is trying to catch up with the trend that the more friends one has, the more popular he is - or at least seems to be. However, some argue that it is more important for happiness to maintain friendships with few people for a long time than to make as many new friends as possible. I totally agree with this view because old friends are more reliable and trustworthy than new ones.
First, having long lasting friendship gives us a sense of belonging. Life is repleted with ups and downs, which in both conditions intimate friends play an irreplaceable role. Not only do they celebrate our achievement, but also genuinely support us when we are in trouble. This kind of bond relationship gives us security and hope that in this world there is someone who will be with us no matter what happens. Take myself for example, I cannot recall how many times I have talked with Zizi, one of my best friends from primary school, about my concerns and secrets that is hard to ask my parents for help, such as complaining about the laborious schoolwork or the strict professor. To me, she is my comforter, a shoulder to cry on, the person who share my happiness, sorrow and pain.
Moreover, old friends are likely to be honest with us. Some people compare old friends to putting an old and comfortable pair of boots. I am inclined to argue against – being old friends with someone is not always relax; it can be awkward actually. They are likely to be the people who tell me not what I want to hear, but what I need to hear – that I am behaving bad at an audition to the drama club and how should I improve my performance – because they know the deepest crevices of who I am, where I am from, what I am worth and capable of. Old friends are often the mirror to ourselves. They know the essence of us and there is nothing more precious than the ability to be completely yourself with someone.
Admittedly, sometimes the ability to make many new friends easily benefits us too. In the society where we often need to team up with others to complete a certain goal - a course presentation, a business report, an engineer project, etc. - people attach great importance to human recourses. Salesmen need to be familiar with their customers quickly to promote products; businessmen want to build cooperating relationships with as many partners as possible; celebrities wish to be popular among all ages; politicians are restlessly seeking for votes from every state. However, this kind of friendship is so meteoric that we break up as long as they cannot bring any profit to us.
In the final analysis, although keeping a close friendship for a long period can consume a lot of effort, it is worthwhile because lifelong friends are reliable and make us feel secured. Therefore, I believe that close friendship with a small group of people is more important for a fulfilled and happy life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- TPO34 integrated 80
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 85
- TPO40 integrated 80
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 81
- TPO42 integrated 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, e.g., first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2556.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 541.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72458410351 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65584479405 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530499075786 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 791.1 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4499182202 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.130434783 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5217391304 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352033042296 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108115011601 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949132532637 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211730315051 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757217700538 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.