The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think this is happening? How does it affect individuals and the community?
In contemporary world, that family meals are vanishing has becoming a publicly discernible phenomenon. There are myriad reasons for the emergence of this issue and that it has resulted in several serious consequences.
There are two main causes which can be attributed to this phenomenon. Firstly, while technological innovations have tremendously revolutionised our daily life, they also exert adverse effects on our interaction and communication. It is very common in several families that instead of having meals together, family members hold onto their own mobile devices, tablets, leading to the disappearance of togetherness. Secondly, due to increasing economic developments. young generations show a propensity for allocating more time at workplaces than at home, resulting in less quality meals with families. For instance, in Japan, working overtime has become a common feature which obviously requires employees to devote to working rather than eating with their families.
Resulted from those above-mentioned complex causes, some notable problems can be seen in both individuals and the whole society. It is visible that fewer meals together will lead to the downfall of communication among family members. This breakdown in interaction can easily result in a loss of family bonds, deteriorating families as a source of mental support. As a result, mental illnesses such as anxiety, depression from which people severely suffer will gain increasing popularity in the long-term period. In addition, the community which lacks social connection established by enjoying meals together may result in the gap among people and this phenomenon will definitely create social unrest, having devastating effects on each person.
In conclusion, owing to technological breakthroughs and fast-paced lifestyle, that the joy of enjoying meals together is disappearing will definitely have negative effects on the whole society.
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 67
- The chart below gives information about European people of different age groups who went to gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 72
- The chart below gives the information of cinema attendance by age group between 1984 and 2000. 78
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Young
...ue to increasing economic developments. young generations show a propensity for alloc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78245614035 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15048643691 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6938028489 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169971289954 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571943655503 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451849924127 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10216768404 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253540338303 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.