Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society. Because of this, all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
In today’s world upbringing of kids matters a lot. Nurturing adolescents in the right manner is possibly the most important factor. Hence, it is generally advised that all the folks must take a course which will further guide them towards better parenting. In my opinion, society apparently need such courses but we should not commercialize it. In this essay we will discuss in depth about the benefits of such courses as well as a shortcoming to it.
To begin with, it is rightly said as you sow so shall you reap. If children are taken care of at an early age they will become civilized nationals. Parents are whole and sole onus for molding a child’s future. Hence, it is always advisable for new parents to learn from online courses or from classes which are conducted face-to-face. This will undoubtedly help them to tackle kid’s psychology and have perception as per child’s requirement. In addition, government can also organize seminars and workshops related to nurturing children with care. For Instance, if such courses are provided free of cost even the rural population can benefit from it.
However, it is usually observed that any good deeds are eventually commercialized. Although, educating parents about raising kids is not a difficult thing to be taught and they just require a little guidance. Unfortunately, there are organizations making money and misleading the society on a wrong path. For instance, few organizations conduct training in international locations and try to shell out money from people.
In conclusion, even though this courses will benefit parents to understand their child and care for them in a better way they should also be aware of hoax training centers before joining.
- During a recent plane journey, you sat next to a businessman who owns a chain of restaurants. You talked to him and he suggested that you should contacthim about a possible job in one of his restaurants.Write a letter to this businessman. In your letterRe 78
- ou are studying a short course in another country Your accommodation was arranged by the course provider There is a major problem with the accommodation Write a letter to the course provider In your letter Say what the problem is Describe the accommodatio 41
- You have borrowed something from your friend, but it was damaged. Write a letter to your friend and say- Apologize for damaging the product- How was it damaged?- What will you do about it? 73
- Wealth does not necessarily guaranty happiness.To what extent do you agree with this statement?Provide reasons for your answer. Include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 11
- A friend, who lives in another country, has invited to you come and stay with him/her on your next holiday. You are too busy to accept the invitation. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: – thank him/her for the invitation – explai 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...htly said as you sow so shall you reap. If children are taken care of at an early ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18794326241 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93523857149 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624113475177 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3183797761 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0588235294 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21910765308 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589539199084 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038610349876 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128699637881 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343080215527 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.