It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example.
Recently, the phenomenon of putting a lesson for analyzing a film in literature studies in order to enhance the efficiency and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although this issue is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that this moduale can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several advantages of adding a analyzing lesson in the curriculum of literature pupils in oder to increase the power of learning. These factors are rooted in the fact of declining the dull time in these lessons. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these advantages. Firstly, this idea can diminish the borring time in theoretical lessons like literature and provide the new and even interesting circumstances for these students. Furthermore, pupils by observing these practical features can practice new method of studying. Moreover, this condition probably leads to some related debates to explore all aspects of the topic of the movie and make pupils consider details.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, the idea of learning literature by watching a film or exhibited play has some opponents. They asserted that it can reduce the amount of concentration among the students. In addition, they argue that the film relatively has some unrelated aspects for learning, and this issue might waste the time.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of making pupils learning the literature lessons by watching films are far more outweigh their demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | malahat_m | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-04 | bashirheidari | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-04 | Mani.Narimani | 88 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree). 80
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universitiesshould only procure digital materials rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantagesand disadvantages of this position an 77
- Problems and benefits for high school students study plays and works of theatres written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own experience. 85
- Business whether big or small is to maximize profit Do you agree with that Give your opinion 79
- Cashless society is becoming a reality More and more people are using credit cards for payment and less people use cash How realistic do you think it is and what do you see in its potential benefits or problems 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... there are several advantages of adding a analyzing lesson in the curriculum of l...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32055749129 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95948269118 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5131288531 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.461538462 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0813532928097 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284568604472 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346108103724 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0584499246574 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288823854725 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.