Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree).
Recently, the phenomenon of the influence of the fascinating lifestyle of some sports and actors stars on the youths' minds and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although thses effects are obvious as it regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that the role of these effects are vital as it could develop some brilliant or catastrophic results for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why the appearience of the the way of life belongs to some well-known successful actors or sportsmen or women affect the adolescents' attitude. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic expperiment which discovered these impacts. These particular settlers are always so rich and have specific lifestyle. The amount of money and revenue which they earn is unblieveable for an array of juveniles. Undoubtedly, the youngsters' ambitions are being in that circumstance by possessing expensive cars, houses and even hiring servents to work at homes.
Furthermore, another paramount reason to prove the influence of the way of life of some sports stars and film actors on opperating the youths' belifes is they are famous. These people are so popular in the public and everyone has complete recongnition of them.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that a number of young generations have the desire to be like the successful sports stars or actors and have the lifestyle like them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-26 | hoandang | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | bashirheidari | 80 | view |
- Government should allocate sources prior to the technology research, do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and examples. 77
- Television has many useful functions to play in everyone’s life, for some its relaxation, for some it is the companion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point. 77
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 11
- The university will deduct the students' score for late assignments. Opinion and solutions? 85
- How widely of you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... several reasons why the appearience of the the way of life belongs to some well-known ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... several reasons why the appearience of the the way of life belongs to some well-known ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adolescents'' or 'adolescent's'?
Suggestion: adolescents'; adolescent's
...actors or sportsmen or women affect the adolescents attitude. From my own experience, when ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29230769231 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01677754327 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588461538462 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8658593976 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133891761284 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421605911292 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471910759376 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083541882257 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321031973666 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.