Some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It has been controversial whether the advent of technology is distancing individuals from social connections in today’s world. While overusing high-tech accessories creates a slight barrier between people, I believe that technology has improved users’ social experience in other ways.
On the one hand, people are indeed reducing their activeness in socializing since the outbreak of technology. Since high technology gadgets are widely available these days, more and more people, especially the young, now spend most of their time sticking to these accessories. As a result, these individuals cease to interact with the surrounding acquaintances which is the reason why some people blame technology for encouraging anti-socialization. Furthermore, since high-end products keep getting improved day after day to deliver convenience to users, people prefer staying at home with their smart systems rather than hanging out with colleagues.
On the other hand, technology has turned social connections to another level with some unique features. Firstly, with the help of online websites such as Facebook and Google Now, people are able to connect with family and friends from anywhere around the world at any time they desire. These platforms allow individuals to stay connected to their relationships without having to meet face-to-face. Secondly, the role of smartphones in today’s social life is undeniably essential. Unlike the past when phones only functioned as a calling device, this gadget nowadays shows personality and the fashion taste of a person which attract the others to socialize with him.
In conclusion, despite technology makes people less active in their face-to-face connections, I strongly believe that these modern devices have brought a new experience to individuals’ social lives
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-12 | drtruong92 | 89 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to control growing numbers of car on the road. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is more important to have a good family than to have friends Family can always compensate for the absence of friendship To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'.How true do you think this statement is?What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 73
- You noticed a room at your company office that can be used as a relaxation room. Write a letter to your manager and ask to use it for this purpose.In your letter,•Explain why you suggest this.•Which room is it?•What changes will need to be done ther 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76383763838 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13101751075 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645756457565 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9831694453 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178791447515 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712377296917 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540964169557 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122748748217 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332217177639 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.