Many people prefer to spend money and not to save it? what are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development?
It is true that many people often spend lot of money every day than fixed deposit or future savings. While, it is often happened by the effect of inflation and demonetization and which is a negatively affected on individual and community. Such as, future well being would be dangerous, and financial crisis may be the ultimate outcome of this phenomenon.
On the one hand, market price has been escalating rapidly in terms of individual needs and natural resources. Earlier, daily needs could be cope up with home made cuisines and resources. While, nowadays for example, every family needs to buy everything from outside and which is high rate and most probably low quality often. People have not money to save after the fulfillment of family needs each days to pay for installments or insurance. Variation in exchange rate has been literally affected on savings such as, international trade and commerce influence the money market as a whole. Furthermore, People inclined to buy things irrespective of actual needs would be a leading criteria to impossibility to save money for tomorrow. For instance, online marketing and installment pay offer makes everyone tend to buy things without money matters.
However, owing to the fact that, make use of extra money for things often makes crisis over economy not only to the society but also individuals. In other words spending much money for daily needs may decline savings and dilemma for emergency purposes. Like an example, Parents who suffer to cope with children studies and academic qualifications to pay for fees and curriculum purpose or medical usage. Moreover, lack of savings for future often make difficulties after retirement or loss of employment. For instance, people who spend much money not efficiently in past-time may have failure to pass retirement crisis and such person probably recommended to old age homes in later life.
To sum up, expenditure of daily needs or present purpose rather consider future by the effect of world trade and trend would be detrimental to the core. Such attitude or matters would make forthcoming life so crucial and critical than the present enjoyment or incentives.
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 75
- Some people think that children should start school sooner while others believe they should not start it before the age of seven Discuss both views and give your own opinion 68
- The graph below shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the years 2001 2006 Write a report for a university tutor describing the information shown Write at least 150 words 84
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...tive of actual needs would be a leading criteria to impossibility to save money for tomo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udies and academic qualifications to pay for fees and curriculum purpose or medic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16147308782 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74778481788 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558073654391 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.20682612 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.176470588 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1569436867 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543640038271 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557231293949 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904396175829 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054447863168 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.