Should University penalize students for late submission of their work?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the penalization of students by universities on late submission of assignments. Some people think that university staff should not penalize the students, while others maintain that pupils submitting their work after deadline must be punsihed. This essay will discuss that why universities should take strict actions against the students, submitting their assignments after the deadline.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated in favour of universities penalizing their students on late submission. Firstly, the most conspicuous is that these citadels of learning are ressponsbile to teach good values and discipline to their pupils. Therefore, students unable to submit their work with in due course of time need to be punsihed, in order to impart the true gist of discipline and importance of time. As a result, it is quite evident that such measures taken by universities are for the betterment and well grooming of the students.
On the other hand, there is another pivotal facet to this argument which underscores that university staff needs to differentiate and assess the students on the basis of their performance as well as timely submission of assignments. As an example, a student working day in and day out to submit his assignments with in specified timeline need to be graded and assessed differently from his counterparts submitting late assignments. As a matter of fact, to grade judiciously, students submitting late assignments are penalized and accorded lesser marks.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that to inculcate discipline and importance of time universities should penalize students on late submission of assignments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-03 | yasamin62 | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | yasamin62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | jashan randhawa | 89 | view |
- role model 56
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 85
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities Do you agree or disagree 55
- Some say that in today s world the value of humanities has been eclipsed by the necessity of preparing for specific wealth producing careers such as medicine Discuss whether you think there is a role in today s changing world for study of the humanities 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, while, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55390334572 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14887663372 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546468401487 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0681093357 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.818181818 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.25397266985 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506969838621 0.242375264174 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194198294231 0.0925447433944 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102975965754 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329597994577 0.151781067708 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624575104144 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.