Development of village
The provided maps indicate the changes that occurred in the village called Kelsbey from 1780 to 2000.
It is clear that the biggest development that happened at the village was a significant increase in the number of homes. Additionally, the woods had completely disappeared by the year 2000.
In 1780, while there were 100 houses in the northeast corner of the map, this figure doubled in 1860 and rised dramatically to 500 in 2000. In contrast, the amount of farm next to the river halved in 1860 and did not exist anymore in 2000. Similarly, the woods in the south area of homes also experienced the same trend and they were cut down to make way for two new schools and two sport fields.
There was a construction of a road from the village to the long river in 1860 and it was developed for another way to area of schools and sport courts by 2000. Moreover, one bridge cross the river appeared in 1860 and still existed in the year 2000. And in 2000, the development of the village continued by erecting many shops along the river and building a area of wetland for birds at the end of this one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-25 | Lethanh54 | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-14 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...many shops along the river and building a area of wetland for birds at the end of...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, similarly, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41850303812 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524752475248 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6348768308 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226082719136 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102220033699 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122947675453 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153349369556 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10037133706 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.