The table shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary School types between between 2000 and 2009
As it is described in a tabular chart about the ratio of students used to attend four different types of secondary school from the year 2000 to till 2000. Data is caliberated in percentage.
After watching the details, it has been observed that least proportion of students went to specialists school which was 12%,11% and 10% in the three consecutive years 2000,2005 and 2009 respectively. Moreover, percentum of pupil in grammar school was fell down from approximately one quarter,in 2000, to half of quarter in 2000.
It is further evident that ratio of students in voluntary-controlled schools had been decreased from peak of 52%, in former year, by 40% in the later year. That was the highest change in students proportion as compare to other three types of schools. Moving further, The proportion of students in community schools had shoot-up to 58% in 2009, which was almost five times of the initial percent(12%).
From overall analysis, it has been clearly evident that the proportion of pupils decreased in three types of schools, whereas, community school student proportion significantly increased.
- Some people believe, they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree. 78
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like. To what extent should children have to follow rules? 73
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like. To what extent should children have to follow rules? 73
- The graph shows the demand for electricity in England during typical in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 73
- H The diagram below shows the process of producing photographs using digital equipments. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As it is described in a tabular chart abou...
^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...fell down from approximately one quarter,in 2000, to half of quarter in 2000. It...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, whereas, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24581005587 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01048385058 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4917922488 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256391363884 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112534837732 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749417810269 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171587315144 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451766867226 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.