do you think that English will remain to be a global language despite globalisation?
Recently, the phenomenon of English will remain to be a global language despite globalisation and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that globalisation can be a plus, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, English will remain to be a global language despite globalisation can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, English will remain to be a global language despite globalisation might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental elements of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of the wrong usage pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this unique phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of English will remain to be a global language despite globalisation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this remarkable phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | SHAISHEL | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-28 | Prince sapkota | 55 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | jitendarjeet | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-22 | Manijot | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | hemsingh81 | 55 | view |
- in a cashless society, people use more credit cards. what are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? agree or disagree? 77
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? 85
- Whether design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? give your opinion. 88
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in school to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... profoundly believe that the benefits of English will remain to be a global langu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65743944637 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25395686728 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584775086505 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3341576665 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413790887471 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14687231915 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175265012327 0.071462118173 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264281831957 0.151781067708 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497073998656 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.