In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary society, it is undeniably true that people, especially students from all over the world have strong desire of being polymath, who have higher level of qualification. However, practical skills, in fact, is being required by employers. In my view, I completely disagree with the argument and I believe that not only experience, but also theoretical knowledge are both necessary to find better job opportunity.
First of all, that we are worship one side is leading us human onto severe limitation, which we are not be able to work efficiently because of some of the barriers. In additional, there have been wide range of people who work in under flexible environment, by using both practice, and also horizon. Moreover, such lack of knowledge as language barriers, limited using of such technology advancement, which have to study in universities have been one of the reason, why unemployment is expanding. For example, my brother has been working in Mining Corporation for 4 years, where is requiring English language because of foreign bosses. Because of limited lexical resources of English, people won’t communicate with my brother.
Secondly, thanks to both practical skills and theoretical knowledge, the better job opportunity is found by people. In additional, these two aspects interact each other harmoniously and these are cannot mutual exchange each other. Let’s doctor profession as example if they do not know fundamental, theoretical comprehension about tool, the doctor operate horribly and there will be a risk of human life. In contrast, just imagine that if the doctor well in practice but limited in information, he or she not be able to play significant role in operating room.
In conclusion, it is well that we human outperform our lesson, but it is logical that not forgetting about practice. Personally, there will be a good consequence, if people know about both aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Sagar Gurung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Tran Mai Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | rania sayed ahmed | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | rania sayed ahmed | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | Muhammed_10 | 78 | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 78
- Some countries encourage teenager to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views 73
- China food consumption 56
- It is much more convenient to watch a movie on television or computer than buy a ticket and go to the cinema. In the nearest future the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...nto severe limitation, which we are not be able to work efficiently because of som...
^^
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... be able to work efficiently because of some of the barriers. In additional, there have bee...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...t limited in information, he or she not be able to play significant role in operat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0254584032 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603896103896 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9976451408 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110447179826 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384468486116 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504298685324 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621551420915 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475283442234 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.