Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
In a society there are a variety of thoughts and ideas and everyone has his own their ideas. Some people may hold the view that teachers should not represent their social and political ideas in the classroom. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint. From my own perspective, the former belief is true. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that a class is a place to teach and learn a myriad of subjects of study which are important for preparing students to their future careers or academic studies. If a teacher expresses his political view, it will always be a heated debate in the class, hence there is not enough time to teach the students. My own experience shows this issue. When I was a college student, my history professor always was talking about parties and politicians. He took a lot of time of the class talking about the politician’s negative effect on starting some wars all around the world. These talks were amazing for us and we always accompanied by the professor. However, when the semester had finished we had difficulty since we did not finish the materials for the class. Finally, we were allowed to take the exam in the next semester. Had he talked about these issues, we would have had taken the exam on time.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that the students were not mature enough, so they can easily influence others thoughts. It means that they do not a chance to study and search for some issues profoundly.so their thoughts are shaped without any profound knowledge.it can affect their future and even their whole lives. For example, my cousin was a high school student that his teacher was invited to the class to join the campaign of his favorite party. At first, it was joyful for his classmates and him. They spent time with each other and participated in heat debates. Gradually he chose this party and became a fan of it. Unfortunately, the leaders of the party had arrested because of some financial scandals. Since the aim of the party did not help build a better society, my cousin regretted spending a lot of time supporting this party.
In conclusion, this is my deep belief that representing political ideas not only waste the class time but also shape inappropriately the student's mind. Therefore, I highly suggest that it is better teachers do not show their political ideas
- about odd sounds 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 60
- the zebra mussel 60
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 70
- Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were in the past. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fore, I highly suggest that it is better teachers do not show their political ide...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80327868852 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64450204534 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536299765808 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0570334441 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4583333333 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7916666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187236849205 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507017472132 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960929175847 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137322256914 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639845541639 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.