People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of government role and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of government officials is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that transportation systems can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, advanced transportation systems can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of road construction, as well as metropolitan cities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered government executives. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both intelligent transportation system and main routes apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, building new roads might increase the consequences of overcrowding streets. Moreover, fundamental aspects of governmental budget relate to this reality that the demerits of intelligent transportation pertain to freeways. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of populated cities is correlated negatively with governmental activities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of advanced systems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of cities being overcrowded far outweigh its drawbacks. Not implications only do the advantages of rural areas prove the significance of overcrowded main routes, but also pinpoint main streets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-07 | rezayi2003 | 88 | view |
| 2018-10-05 | sadegh shahsavand | 69 | view |
| 2018-05-08 | Anonymous | 55 | view |
- do you agree that doctors and teachers should be paid more than others? 88
- Do you that with online information library books are useless? 85
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities Do you agree or disagree 69
- do you agree that universities should provide so much theoretical knowledge or give more practical training throughout their courses? 80
- do you agree that the government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9203187251 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44992316001 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665338645418 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8034594017 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.833333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20052407816 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606700022228 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436485037006 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100964851147 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358754154215 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.