A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by the people and they should have the same rights as human, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Some people assert that animals should be treated in the same way as human are and have similar rights. Whereas, others refute that it is pivotal to use them as we desire for food and medical research. In my opinion, it certainly makes that animals should be used to serve human needs but they should also be treated properly.
On the one hand, humanity does not have rights to exploit these living beings because they also contain the same biological structure as we human possess. They have same feelings and emotion. Furthermore, it is also wrong to use them as a transport source in this modern world. With the excess of trucks and Lorries which use to carry heavy goods from one place to another but still this type of activity is running in many parts of the world. For instance, in the Somalia 60% of the transportation system is totally based on the animals.
On the flip side, animals can be served in different motives to facilitate the people. In terms of food perspective, the meat of the goat and chicken are very vital to keep our body fit. Doctors also recommend that if a patient is suffering from the cholesterol problem, the boil chicken seems to be very helpful to control this disease. Moreover, the toxic chemicals emit from many species like lizards and crocodiles are useful for making new drugs and used in different treatment purposes. For example, Japan has recently done a research on a new herb prepared from the distillation process of at least 100 cockroaches which is proved to be beneficial to reduce the chances of the heart cancer problem.
To recapitulate, both sides of the arguments have their own merits but I strongly believe that animals are also the creatures of God and no one has any power to hurt them badly. If we provide them a respective place in the society and employed them in appropriate ways, we can able to get tremendous benefits from them for the well-being of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-22 | Kapil Kumar | 84 | view |
- The maps shows how Sidney international airport was in 1930 and how it is today 68
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by the people and they should have the same rights as human, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. 84
- The big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- Nowadays people get married and have children after the age of 30 Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- In many countries of the world, space for additional horizontal has run out and people are beginning in multi storied apartment buildings. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in high rise building and state in your own opinion. Where you wo 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 322, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... the excess of trucks and Lorries which use to carry heavy goods from one place to ...
^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...s. For example, Japan has recently done a research on a new herb prepared from the distill...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, at least, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68235294118 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50905626119 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561764705882 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9851333467 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3168700542 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105198302053 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979687795732 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192892762008 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134693404271 0.056905535591 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.