Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples.
Quite often one encounters an extensive discussion among various sections of people in the respect to whether large malls can replace small shops. One segment shows inclination towards positive direction of the replacement of small ones by huge malls. Also, one can witness a section whose conviction can contradict with the other category. When it comes to my stance on this topic, I would demonstrate my partial acceptance. I wish to describe in detail both positive side and highlight the adverse stream regarding encouraging only malls.
Firstly, when I think of brighter aspect with regard to large establishments, many advantages flash in. One of the few benefits that can be reiterated in this juncture is that one can find what one wants under one roof. The way a person experience the benefits requires reiteration. The world offer myriad instances validating the authenticity of these merits in the backdrop of this topic. These positive aspects are not confined to one set of people. Regardless of age or place, one can immensely get him lf of all possible gains.
In the next place, drawbacks could be inevitably perceived. Though what has been brought on to this planet can be advantageous, one can inescapably observe a completely different shade and this topic cannot be an exception. The one that requires reference could be that this can’t fulfill the needs of people.
It can be concluded that one would better strike a balance between what is beneficial and what can be harmful. Hence, it is always advisable to direct one’s effort in the right direction.
- Some people feel that assessment through formal written examinations is valid.do you agree or disagree with it? 85
- Learning a new language at an early age is useful for children. Will this have a positive or adverse impact on children? 55
- some people feel that assessment through formal written examinations is valid.do you agree or disagree with it? 79
- some people feel that assessment through formal written examinations is valid.do you agree or disagree with it? 79
- Learning a new language at an early age is useful for children. Will this have a positive or adverse impact on children? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, so, then, i think, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09195402299 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83047127731 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616858237548 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0131107698 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0625 104.977214359 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134716346507 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448758817758 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053599034486 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862589574886 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435708828163 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.