Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement argues that educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. I strongly disagree with this statement because it assumes that schools have the power to determine the possibility for students to succeed. The way to success is not like cooking – following a recipe to achieve a good result; it is a complex and dynamic process that can be influenced by many factors in the society, and it is unlikely to have a guidebook for evaluating the possibility of success.
The schools' judgment on the likelihood of success may largely base on academic performance, which is one-sided to understand students’ abilities and growth. In some cases, the grades are low in reliability to predict students' performance. One of my friends in undergraduate was not a typical "good" student -- he often missed classes and got bad grades for exams. Later, however, he, as an undergraduate, succeeded in publishing an English paper in a top 3 journal of developmental psychology, and he became the legend of the department as no one had done this before. After talking with him, I came to realize that he spent most of his time researching by himself -- going to the kindergarten to collect data alone and doing the analysis at home. It is hard for schools to determine the possibility of students' success because students often perform differently under different contexts. The information for schools to make judgment may be limited and biased.
Sometimes even if students don't show any talent in the relevant field from all aspects of their performance, schools should not simply dissuade them from giving up. It is common that people are slow in studying in the beginning and catch up with their peers later. Development is a dynamic process rather than fixed points; it is likely that students may perform better after hard working driven by their interests. As the old saying goes, interests are the best teachers. Imagine that a school dissuades its students from pursuing fields that they are unlikely to succeed, then what should students study instead of the original field? It is easy to destroy than to reconstruct; students lose their original passion may fail to find new paths, which leads to a devastating result.
Although some people will argue that it is hard for a blind person to learn to pilot, to say that educational institutions should not to discourage students from pursuing their chosen fields is not equal to say that schools should encourage students to do whatever they want to do. When students get enrolled in a certain field, they must have passed the minimum requirement of studying that field -- they are qualified in the first place. What I try to argue here is that it is not educational institutions' responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing their original fields because the criteria that they use to decide the likelihood to succeed is not reliable and they don't have rights to extinguish students' interests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 54
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 83
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...ing the possibility of success. The schools judgment on the likelihood of success m...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'journal' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'journals'.
Suggestion: journals
... publishing an English paper in a top 3 journal of developmental psychology, and he bec...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... biased. Sometimes even if students dont show any talent in the relevant field f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 496, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
...rgue here is that it is not educational institutions responsibility to dissuade students fro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 612, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...l fields because the criteria that they use to decide the likelihood to succeed is ...
^^^
Line 7, column 677, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ood to succeed is not reliable and they dont have rights to extinguish students inte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, then, in some cases, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2543.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.086 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87776501595 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2222804819 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.842105263 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3157894737 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300732915977 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967458478822 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108907765139 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199969933194 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800188198856 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.