Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
There is no denying fact that in a modern world lifestyle has revolutionized and is completely different from its past. There are definitely distinct advantages and disadvantaged for this process but, the fact that our lives have changed in diverse aspects is indisputable. I strongly believe that in today's world young people depend less on their parents to make decisions and they are more influenced by their close friends and different media like internet which has absolutely had a major effect on our dependency. In the following essay, I will delve into my most prominent reasons for this viewpoint.
First of all, let us consider the close relationship between the families who lived in earlier generations. To be frank, we all have heard from older people how much they used to respect their parents, and they were not allowed to choose without asking their opinion about any single thing. Most of the times the young boys could not even choose their marriage partner and their field of interest for having a job. For instance, They often had to follow their paternal occupation.
Furthermore, no one can avoid the influence of modern technology in nearly all aspects of our lives. The internet which now has become a fundamental part of anyone's life, was not available those days. Not surprisingly, the wide range in which it can help us to solve any problem has resulted in more autonomous young adults whose decisions are no longer influenced by their parents. Nowadays, we can search for every single thing that comes to our mind and see the reliable results in a few seconds. It provides us a chance to read others experiences about the same issue, and to decide more conveniently.
In a word, we live in an interdependent world which has completely changed in a way that we see far more self-made young adults who are more likely to depend on their own abilities and choose by their own knowledge and the great help of technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | nusybah | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | 3dra | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | naziii | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86486486486 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69239609725 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3535760046 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264076180153 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777181615208 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773325320731 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153227632196 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504535239392 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.