Nowadays, there are more opportunities for women than there were in the past. Some people think this situation has caused more problems than it has so.
What are your opinions on this?
During the past century, women have gained more rights in many nations across the world. Never before have women been given such chances to take part in many social works – which causes a variety of problems according to a number of people. I partially agree with that, but I believe the world is gaining more benefits rather than suffering from this trend.
First of all, more women participate in the job market means that nations can use the labor force more efficiently. Not only does the number of labor increase but the skills of labors will be enhanced. For women are normally considered to be meticulous and dexterous in their work performance, an increasing number of women working allows companies to improve job-related skills faster, which will be economically beneficial. Factories, for example, will witness a cut down in the number of employees due to the greater productivity of workers and therefore, will save entrepreneurs from the huge expenses of workers' salary.
Some people argue that allowing women working full time will result in their neglectfulness on family responsibilities such are chores, raising children, etc... I believe that there is little evidence to support this view. Despite the fact that women work full-time, they only work for 8 hours and still have plenty of time to do household jobs. Furthermore, in this contemporary society, housework are started to be shared among family members, especially in developed countries. This will make it easier for women to focus on their own career without great concerns for their home life.
To sum up, the fact women being given choices to live their own life is one of the greatest achievement of the modern world. Whilst there are some views concern that there are problems associated to this, to me, it is undeniable that the benefits we gain from this outweighs the minor consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-23 | mahmoudsaad333 | 67 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | phandamquan | 81 | view |
- Pros and cons of Age of Political Candidacy 63
- Modern lifestyles are completely different from the way people lived in the past. Someone think the changes have been very positive, while others believe they have been negative.Discuss both these points of view and give your opinion. 84
- Nowadays, there are more opportunities for women than there were in the past. Some people think this situation has caused more problems than it has so.What are your opinions on this? 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...ights in many nations across the world. Never before have women been given such chanc...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...eople argue that allowing women working full time will result in their neglectfulness on ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06752411576 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69383149341 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591639871383 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1429162724 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232689649458 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799501603905 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512226275926 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139451346978 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422125152718 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.