Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to control growing numbers of car on the road. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Given a large number of personal vehicles, some people think that an increase in the cost of fuel will be the best solution for this issue. In my opinion, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea as other methods are no longer effective nowadays.
To begin with, several measurements from governments and organizations to reduce the growing number of individual cars have been of futility these days. One clear example is the failure in the authority’s attempt to lower car density on the road by extending the traffic network and infrastructures. This failure is due to the induced demand of people. When more roads are available, people are convinced that there will be more capacity for them to join the traffic, which will even encourage drivers to use cars more often. Thus, traveling vehicles on the street will be increased instead of a decrease as expected. In Ho Chi Minh City, for example, despite many overpasses have been established lately, gridlocks at intersections still occur because people assume such systems are built to invite more vehicles.
At this point, a rise in the cost of gas will be the only solution that prevents people from driving personal vehicles. By applying a much higher price for fuel, drivers will have to use their vehicles less frequently to save their own money. Subsequently, people will turn to use public transportations such as subways or electric trams to commute because these means of transport are more economical for individuals resulting in the lower number of vehicles on the street. Obviously, striking on people’s money directly is a more practical and more effective way to control the use and possession of cars.
In conclusion, I assert that a higher cost of gas consumption will definitely help deduct the growing number of personal vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-05 | drtruong92 | 73 | view |
- Organized tours to remote areas and community are becoming more and more popular. Is this a positive or negative development for local people and the environment? 78
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationships Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Some people believe that everyone has the right to receive university education, so the government should make it free to all people regardless of their financial background. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Once children start school, the teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than parents.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 56
- Write a letter to your friend who wants to visit your hometown In your letter say When is the best time to visit Recommend someplace to stay Invite her him to your house 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
Given a large number of personal vehicles, some people think th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...ys or electric trams to commute because these means of transport are more economical for in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, still, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10738255034 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91067101636 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8940359335 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.076923077 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124370865863 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449067289551 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331443499851 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792569647662 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018202607789 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.