Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Teachers play a very important role on everyone's life, because a considerable part of their personality is shaped by teachers. From a long time ago teachers were always among the most respected people in society, however these days value of teachers is less prominent than previous. This reduced appreciation is the results of several factors which are discussed below.
Firstly, in old days teachers were among the few educated people in society, and because of their knowledge they very valued greatly. My grandfather once told me that when he was a child the only people which could have read in their city were their teacher and the governor. Considering they were the only people able to read, there was a huge gap between their knowledge level and other citizens, and this made all people to be awed by their knowledge and hence specially value them.
Secondly, likewise, finding a teacher to get education from was very difficult in past. Since very few people had education, and most of the educated people were in governmental jobs and did not put their time for teaching others, the people who sacrificed their time to teach the others were truly valued. To illustrate this point, it is better to have a view on the number of people in comparison to the number of teachers available in past. I read in an article in Keihan newspaper that in 1976, there was 124 teachers for the 4 million population of the country, and even this number were just available in larger cities. For this reason, teachers were among the mostly valued individuals.
On the other hand, these days most of the people are educated and able to teach the others. Although still teachers undoubtly impact their student's life and personality and are respected in society, but they are far from the extraordinary and rare teachers in past times.
Overall, teachers were appreciated more in the past because there was very few number of educated people around in those times and also teaching was considered some kind of sacrify in past. However today lots of teachers are available and their have become part of the ordinary society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Sarrraaa | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | 3dra | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | bishal sitaula | 68 | view |
- TPO 47 3
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 73
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 80
- TPO 45 3
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...o get education from was very difficult in past. Since very few people had education, a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...son to the number of teachers available in past. I read in an article in Keihan newspap...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...more in the past because there was very few number of educated people around in those time...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 183, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ing was considered some kind of sacrify in past. However today lots of teachers are ava...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, still, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90277777778 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50874858135 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4209722719 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15673293221 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686982815914 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448076614438 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105675731103 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171025509824 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.