The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations reduce consumption of fossil fuel (gas and oil). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The use of fossil fuel is increasing rapidly across the globe. Increased consumption is causing detrimental effects to the environment specifically global warming. I, strongly agree with the notion that international community has veto power and can made the legislation that restrict all countries to reduce the consumption of fossil fuel. This essay will demonstrate deleterious effects of fossil fuel usage and role of international community to control the situation.
To start with, fossil fuel consumption is intuitively perceived as the primary cause of global warming. It is agreed that burning of coal and oil produce ton of carbon dioxide which are release in environment as a result, the temperature of world increase which causes melting of polar ice caps, flooding of lower lying areas and rise in sea level. Consequently, world is facing various natural disasters such as Hurricane Irma in Florida in 2017. Consistent, with this line of thinking consumption of fossil fuel leads to temperature change and natural disaster which are cause of catastrophic deaths and huge losses to world.
In addition, International community namely UNO act as legal body that can regulate the law for consumption of fossil fuel. Moreover, these communities may provide loans for installation of other energy sources that can be used as an alternative like Solar, Nuclear and Hydro energy. Thus, the roles of these organizations are dominant because they have unrestricted rights and non-compliance of laws by one country can cause collateral damages.
To conclude, environmental problems and their causes are global issues. It is mandatory for global communities to come forward to take effective measures and provide means for alternative sources to the countries.
- Some psychologists say that doing absolutely nothing for a period of time each day is the key to decreasing stress in everyday life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think watching movies is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Too much money is wasted on exploring the oceans. This money would be better spent elsewhere. Discuss both sides. 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 89
- Many people use their phones for sending text more than talking What are the reasons for this Are there more advantages than disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rophic deaths and huge losses to world. In addition, International community nam...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (UNO) must be used with a third-person verb: 'acts'.
Suggestion: acts
...ion, International community namely UNO act as legal body that can regulate the law...
^^^
Line 8, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r alternative sources to the countries.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, moreover, so, thus, in addition, such as, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48175182482 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03561013177 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598540145985 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0329029241 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.538461538 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213603978997 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804904055368 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813520770874 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122002315568 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980988109508 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.