Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the modern area, people really need some times that they can reduce stress and make refresh. Hence, travel industry is flourishing for proper surpassing life. Whether people prefer use tour for go to travel or go with themselves is controversial. According what I generally believe, most people tend to utilize tour for trip; therefore, I agree with this proposal. The following paragraphs by containing the main reasons, will substantiate my viewpoint.
The main reasons why I believe traveler decided go to journey with tour leader and they assumed that this is the best way for travel is aspect of economical. To elaborate on my point, since people who want go to trip do not use their own cars, tour travels are really economical. On the other words, traveler do not need to pay money for some case such as petroleum, static of cars, high expensive hotel and many other similar items and containers so that they can save their money. In many trip tour, people pay amount of certain money for many things like buses, hotels and meal of food which this money is lower than the price of gas and oil and another cases I mentioned. It is worth mention that travelling with tour have less exhausted than drive with personality cars in order that passengers have pleasure times. A significant example that strikes my mind is about my own experience. Last years, me and one of my friend decided go to Esfahan for travel. We went to trip by special tour that we paid only 30000 Tomans for 4 days. We went to special hotels with excellent food. This trip was so economical for me and my friend. For this reasons, not only we have happiness times but also we can save money.
In addition, I think that tour leaders have high information about places which have special view and sightseeing. Inasmuch as tour leaders is jobs that must know about many places, they have better information about cities which people want to sees. Hereupon, traveler can see the special place with tour guide so that they are really enjoyed trip. A quite clear example would be my own trip. Last month, I went to north of Iran with special tour and our tour leaders had acknowledged about dominant novel jungles. Thus, owing to having information, tour leaders brought us to special environmental. If I go to this jungle with myself, I would not find this place.
To conclude, I generally believe that many humans really prefer go to travel with tour leaders. Tour leaders not only have comprehensive information about environmental but also make excellent sense for people. Furthermore, this kind of tripe have economical aspect side.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Pakshid | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | 2507575150 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Chara | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1139, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...so economical for me and my friend. For this reasons, not only we have happiness tim...
^^^^
Line 6, column 247, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'see'.
Suggestion: see
...ation about cities which people want to sees. Hereupon, traveler can see the special...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, really, so, therefore, thus, as to, i think, in addition, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53345906921 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49889135255 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8371712563 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5769230769 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3461538462 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19230769231 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168367492608 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541999872106 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473946045831 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110714826465 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245035798855 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.