Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In my opinion, keeping a pet is not a good habit. Because as these kinds of relationships get stronger and continue for a long time, the costs of their keeping may impose a financial burdent to on the owner. In addition, the relationship between pets and their human owners may disturb the essential relationships between the owner and the other humans.
First of all, keeping a pet might account for a large proportion of regular expenditures of an individual or a household. If a person gets emotionally dependent to a pet, he should provide it with a lot of stuffs which costs even more than raising a human child. For example, many people keep a dog as a pet. They are required to take shower for the dog every day, or twice a day, and also purchase a lot of edible materials such as meat for daily nutrition of a dog. There are more similar examples about of cats, birds etc. So, if the owner reduces the emotional feeling about different pets and sale or donate them to other people, they also can get rid of an immense financial burden.
Second, pets may disrupt the relationship between the owner and his relatives. Many pets may be carrying some viruses or noxious bacteria that some nearby humans, such as the owner, may catch some diseases from the pets. For example, many infectious diseases are common between dogs and humans. If only the owners who are aware of such a problem may take some preventive actions in order to avoid the transition of such diseases. Otherwise, many owners and his relatives may be exposed to dangerous diseases. So, catching some diseases could be another consequence of a strong relationship between humans and pets. Also, there are some people who are allergic to some animals such as cats. If somebody keep one or a number of cats as a pet, they may annoy the guests who are invited to the owner's home. So, not having any pets may strengthen the relationships between humans.
All in All, I think it is not a good idea to keep a pet and these kinds of relationships may affect the humans' relationships and impose much many financial expenditures to the owner.
- TPO 42Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- What are some of the qualities of a good parent? Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 60
- 178 BarronsThe 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? Use examples and details in your amswer. 3
- In your country, is there more need for land to be left in its natural conditions or is there more need for land to be developed for housing and industry? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 49Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ses are common between dogs and humans. If only the owners who are aware of such a...
^^
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'keeps'.
Suggestion: keeps
... some animals such as cats. If somebody keep one or a number of cats as a pet, they ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, then, for example, i think, in addition, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64171122995 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63465467275 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48128342246 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7526684005 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3684210526 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152871605798 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563494714734 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417702472645 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110295902897 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478530383758 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.