Some people think that the media (newspapers) have the right to publish details of people’s private life, while other’s think it should be controlled. Discuss both views.
Opinions differ as to whether newspapers hold the right to publicize people’s personal life or a strict control should be put upon such an action. This essay will discuss two opposing ideas.
To begin with, it is understandable why some people support the publishment private details on newspapers. One reason is that some individuals, especially celebrities and political figures, would want to have their name widely known. Thus, they would allow newspapers to write articles about their daily healthy routines in order to cultivate interests from the mass population. For example, the publicity of a prominent politician’s pastimes of charity or helping the elderly would significantly boost his credibility among all citizens, especially his supporters. Likewise, an article of a musician showing that he also regularly spends time on drawing on the weekends would showcase his talents and attract more fans.
On the contrary, there are valid reasons for newspapers to be controlled on exposing people’s private life. Firstly, the flaw aspects of individuals should not be shared publicly as it will damage their images. For instance, a news about the love affair of an actress will cause a massive scandal resulting in a decrease of her reputation. Similarly, an extravagant life of a royal member when unveiled would bring an abomination to him and the entire royal family. Moreover, uncontrolled publicity of private details means that people’s lives are being illegally invaded and recorded, which may be against their will and certainly violate the law of privacy. Therefore, every publisher should be strongly restricted in recording and sharing private lives unless they acquire people’s permission.
In conclusion, while some people accept the news coverage of their personal life for promoting purposes, others believe publishers should be strictly controlled as non-permitted publicity of private details might rather harm their reputation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-17 | jenny0918 | 89 | view |
| 2018-11-20 | drtruong92 | 84 | view |
- Your local newspaper is offering an award for people who have helped the community. Write a letter to the newspaper editor. In your letter suggest someone you think should receive the award describe what the person does to help the community sugg 73
- Writing task 1 the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that criminals should be given long term in prison, so as to reduce to crime rate. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging to their health. Some people think that these problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food. Other people believe that education will not work. Discuss b 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions differ as to whether newspapers hold the right to publicize ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...will damage their images. For instance, a news about the love affair of an actress wil...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, likewise, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04552677436 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.337548137 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.642857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0714285714 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32828785061 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113370424765 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100666438091 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205650417725 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534839243507 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.