When you are deciding which of the two places to visit, should you discuss with someone who has visited the two places or read online and why?
Recent years have witnessed the tremendous accumulation of material affluence, so people can spare more energy to concentrate on spiritual pursuit. As a means to promote spiritual life, travelling, both inbound and outbound, takes up a large portion of time in contemporary society. Airbnb, TripAdvisor, and Booking are popular applications that people fond of travelling often turn to when making strategies. However, a myriad of people are still in favor of the idea that suggestions from their friends who have been to their target places are more reliable. When it comes to a more pleasant trip, I myself am a firm advocate of seeking information online.
First off, online resources are unbiased information, allowing people to receive objective views of their travelling destinations. There are a thousand Hamlets in a thousand people's eyes, explicitly conveying an idea that there is a high probability that different people will hold diverse standpoints towards the same topic. A place where your friend visited happens to be your next desirable destination, which may, of course, have you equipped with valuable suggestions, but as well as may hinder you from stepping on that land. Take myself as an example. Before designing my spring-break trip to Turkey, I was struck by a memory that one of my friends travelled there two years ago and immediately texted her to give me some tips. My classmate was so warm-hearted that she drew a detailed plan for me, the top tourist attractions, such as St. Sophia church and The Blue Mosque, were included. In addition, she also reminded me that The Museum of Innocence is a sight spot that I could barely skip. Fortunately, I did not follow her suggestion blindly; instead, I browsed Mafengwo, a highly-renowned website for travelogues, for more personalized information, as a result of which, I categorized this museum as one of my must-sees for it was a concept museum established by Nobel Prize winner Orhan Pamuk on the basis of his novel of the same name, which also induced me to read this novel before the trip. My decision turned out to be sensible, and the museum proved to be a marvel with its delicacy. Travelling is more or less a private conduct; therefore, not advice from experienced friends but unselected and unprejudiced online information corresponds with each person’s idiosyncrasy.
On top of that, the Internet will repeatedly update its sources so as to ensure readers could keep pace with the latest guidance. Keeping informed of travelling information by the Internet means that you hardly be obsolete. What acquaintances could do is to provide vivid, face-to-face description of the place they have gone to and you will go to, a direct way to access to first-hand information. Nevertheless, the progression of modern age accelerates the update of information: hostels, restaurants, bus routes, or even the whole target place might be different in two-month time. Consequently, consulting with friends could fall shout of accuracy. For example, I recommended my sister that she should not visit Gulangyu Island, Xiamen Province, for the unpalatability and expensiveness of its food, or even worse the whole Gulangyu plan should be eliminated from her schedule because of the fact that there was no difference between it and other ancient towns like Wuzhen and Lijiang. Luckily enough and regardless of my obstinacy, my sister made a thorough investigation on the Internet, and the result came as that the local Bureau of Commodity carried out regulations to resolve price-related problems, and what I have mentioned became a story of a different version. Thanks to the Internet, my sister had the opportunity to visit this petite, exquisite, and temperate island. Since the rapid development of the world puts everything on its spin, our friends have limited channels to the latest and most accurate information and the Internet is the last resort travellers should turn to when making decision regarding whether a place deserves a visit or not.
In a nutshell, it is quite common for us to seek advice from our buddies when planning a trip to places they have been before, but in most cases, more benefits can be available if we pick up some travelling information from the Internet. After all, it is our disposition rather than other people’s advice that determines what our preferences are and what sort of information we are in urgent need of.
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 90
- Which one is the most important factor to help you work productively?Having an environment which is free of noise and distractionsKnowing that you will receive a rewardDoing something you are interested in 73
- If a city has given the money to investment, which options do you prefer listed in the following 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Physical exercise is more important to older people than to younger people 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing sports teaches people important lessons about life. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 659, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... advocate of seeking information online. First off, online resources are unbiased...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1699, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds with each person's idiosyncrasy. On top of that, the Internet will repeat...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rnet will repeatedly update its sources so as to ensure readers could keep pace with the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put after the verb 'be'.
Suggestion: be hardly
...ormation by the Internet means that you hardly be obsolete. What acquaintances could do i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 882, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... should be eliminated from her schedule because of the fact that there was no difference between it and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1667, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...whether a place deserves a visit or not. In a nutshell, it is quite common for u...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, after all, as to, for example, in addition, of course, sort of, such as, as a result, as well as, in most cases, more or less, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 75.0 43.0788530466 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 94.0 52.1666666667 180% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3731.0 1977.66487455 189% => OK
No of words: 726.0 407.700716846 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1391184573 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.19079831727 4.48103885553 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04524521672 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 391.0 212.727598566 184% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538567493113 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 1179.9 618.680645161 191% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.971724016 48.9658058833 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.217391304 100.406767564 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5652173913 20.6045352989 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6086956522 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18257265107 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438061968399 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483617576768 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964800768699 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533497105388 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 11.7677419355 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 206.0 86.8835125448 237% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.