Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Law and legislation are one of the most controversial topics in all societies. The importance of this issue is not cover to anyone and this importance makes this topic valuable to discuss. In each country, some people believe laws should be rigid which makes it easy for all people to adapt to it and know what is legal and what is not. On the other hand, if laws are flexible, they can cover different situations and circumstances. In my eyes, it is better laws not be totally rigid, and I will evaluate on my opinion for the following reasons.
The first point worth to mention is that situations are not stable and fixed in all the time and it makes it necessary to have laws which have the ability to be changed in response to the time. The flexibility of laws makes it possible for them to be useful in situations that may not have happened in the past. Legislators always try to predict different situations and set some specific rules for them. But, even the cleverest people cannot assure that they are aware of all the future conditions. Based on this point, it is necessary to make laws flexible which allows them to be changed a little in different situations and be applicable. As an instance, I can mention my country, Iran. Based on the Islamic laws which is the base of all of our laws, young ladies should have the permission of their father at the time they want to marry. At first glance, it may seem rigid and inapplicable at the current time. But, it worth to pay attention that thousand years ago, when our prophet Mohammad, announced this law, it was based on the situation of that time. Now, lots of things have changed and at this time, if these ladies have academic situations or are older than twenty- eight, they do not need this permission anymore.
Second, legislators are not aware of all the circumstances which may happen in different places, and that is why laws should be flexible to have application in situations. Just as the point mentioned regarding time, everything can be different in various locations which need different laws as well. By having a changeable law, people can benefit them in all the world and follow some rules which have the same base but are adapted to different places. This point shows its importance in the case of global laws for the most. For instance, the Institute of FDA sets laws regarding foods for all the world and all the countries should make sure to follow them, But, these laws have some flexibility as well. As an example, it is not legal to use H2O2 in the process of Milk, But, in some places which the situation of keeping food is not good and people do not have access to refrigerators, food companies are allowed to use this component which helps to keep milk for a longer time. This example clearly shows the need for flexibility in laws for different places.
To sum up, all the people around the world need laws which are clear and individuals can make sure they will not change basically. But, it is also important that they do not be rigid which takes their application for different time and laces. Although rigid laws can make everything clear about them, the flexibility of laws allows them to have application in any cases. Based on these justifications, I believe laws should be changeable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | jason123 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | p30kh40 | 50 | view |
- visual-spatial intelligence 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- The passage discusses a painting which is said that is a painting of a well know artist Jane Austen and provides some reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the professor provides his own reasons and explains why he is against all claims in the 68
- establishing colonies and traveling to Asteroids and some problems of that 73
- agree or disagree?television had a positive effect on socoety 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, well, for instance, in any case, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2712.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 584.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64383561644 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54886564609 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.390410958904 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 851.4 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8151024643 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26923076923 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239013349093 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875080675975 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688319297346 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18803761229 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382532134128 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.